Disagree with our picks? Let us know what upcoming trends, companies and technologies we missed in Next Little Thing 2008. Filed under Next Little Thing
Posted by emilymaltby 8:53 am 12 Comments
Bedouin Networks - Combining 2 of the 5 disruptive technologies of 2008 and More reliable, less expensive information systems via virtualized hosted network services. http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204800563&pgno=3&queryText= http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/21/magazines/fortune/kirkpatrick_fastforward_riverbed.fortune/index.htm Posted By Rick Parker, Torrance, Ca. : January 11, 2008 12:14 am
Re: canoe Posted By canoe paddler : December 28, 2007 2:23 pm
Yeah, vOfficeware really is an amazing tool for those looking to start up small businesses. I just heard about it recently and I didn’t realize just how easy it would be to use. Posted By Tejal, New York NY : December 26, 2007 12:38 pm
Pavan, Interesting site (vofficeware.com). I like their angle with helping small businesses. Posted By Tim, Washington DC : December 13, 2007 9:30 pm
Brian - I went through your site, and it looks great! I actually have come across another set of tools which is geared towards small business start-up which is at a fraction of the price: http://www.vOfficeware.com Not directed towards contractors specifically, however can also have a great impact on small businesses. Posted By Pavan - New York, NY : December 13, 2007 1:26 pm
The next little thing is the SMALL BUSINESS making a dramatic impact to our economy. For example, there are millions of small, mobile contractors in the home repair, remodeling and construction industry who run their business mostly by pen, paper (napkin, etc.) and cellphone. Now just imagine them replacing that all with Software-as-a-Service technology on a Tablet PC. We can, Brian & the team at MyOnlineToolbox.com Posted By Brian Javeline, Pompano Beach, FL : December 11, 2007 3:16 pm
CANT WAIT UNTIL CUSTOMER CAN FLY ONE OF THOSE… I WANT ONE… CAN I DO A TEST FLIGHT ? Posted By DOROTHY LOWERS KANSAS : December 8, 2007 7:25 pm
Do you know that there is a fine of $100.00 to file paper Form 355S Massachusetts Corporate Excise tax? This is tax on tax! Posted By Frank Ng : December 4, 2007 7:46 pm
The Toyota Prius is hardly the champ of little wind resistance. The Honda Insight beats it by some 50% but, sad to say, has been dropped from the Honda line this year. Drop by and drive ours. You’d be amazed. Posted By Robert Mankoff, Babylon, NY : December 4, 2007 6:51 pm
Hello; I enjoyed reading the article on electric cars in the last issue of FSB, and there was one thing I found disturbing. The article refers to ‘Global Warming’ as if it were a proven fact. While Al Gore seems to have regained center stage with his ironically errant “An Inconvenient Truth”, and global warming activists have brought this topic to a religious level, where all disbelievers are convicted of heresy without a trial; there remains one, still inconvenient truth. Global Warming is a theory, and as such, has not been scientifically proven. A fact, according to science, is a theory that has been tested and proven under the same circumstances at least two times and produced identical results which may again be reproduced at any time. Only when something has passed this test is it considered a fact. To consider Global Warming any more than a theory is to lend undue legitimacy to what is now a religion, and this is an abortion of the meaning of journalism (reporting the facts). It also, sadly, lends a slant to the article which I have not noticed in the magazine until this article. This being said, I did enjoy the article, and the cars are impressive. Anything that gets better gas mileage and reduces emissions is a good thing, I will not disagree with that. Let’s just stick to the facts, and not get excited about the religion. Thank you. Isaac Wilson Posted By Isaac Wilson, Vancouver, WA : December 4, 2007 5:03 pm
re: Next Small Thing For some years now, a smaller version of the traditional Hawaiian outrigger canoe for one person has been attempting to gain a following but has been hampered by production bottlenecks to supply demand on Hawaiian islands plus a steady following on west and east coasts. (I am only frustrated participant who is one having difficulty procuring a canoe!) Posted By R Loughridge, Pont Breaux, LA : November 30, 2007 2:44 am
To send a letter to the editor about FSB Features, click here. CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
|
|
Dear Mr. Dumaine:
I may be the millionth person to point this out—and that would be a very good thing were it true—but some of your recent writing is, to put it politely, way off the mark.
In your article in Fortune Small Business of November 28, 2007, which was titled, “Putting the zoom into electric cars,” you made the following assertion:
“Switching from internal-combustion engines to electric-powered vehicles will seriously mitigate the effects of global warming.”
Apparently, you haven’t given much thought to the origins of electric power. Surely you must realize that over three quarters of the electric power in the US is generated by burning fossil fuels. So switching to electric power does not “seriously mitigate the effects of global warming” unless the power comes from other means. Some of these means, such as nuclear generation, are far too dangerous over the long term to warrant further consideration. There is, of course, wind power—and solar, too. But these are currently expensive and not at all widespread. Hydroelectric power is also possible, but I suspect that America lacks the political will to overcome the objections to more big dams.
That said, there are still good reasons to consider electric-powered vehicles as a means to lower greenhouse-gas emission. They consist mostly in economies of scale—a dollar spent in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions goes a lot further at an electric-power plant than it does in an individual automobile—and in the potential to sequester carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants, a technology that struggles today to achieve pilot scale.
Perhaps the best arguments are political and economic in nature. After all, most electric-power plants burn coal, which is available in abundance in the US. Had we a coal-based rather than petroleum-based transportation economy, there would have been virtually no political support for ginning up reasons to excuse the illegal invasion of oil-rich Iraq—and great amounts of American blood and treasure would have been spared for more useful purposes. And it is no secret that Saudi petro-dollar-funded Wahhabi madrassas worldwide have created hundreds of thousands of America-hating, extremist Muslims. No oil, no Saudi-fueled, global hate machine.
So, in the end, you are close to being right, but for the wrong reasons: getting Americans to use coal-produced electricity instead of oil as their transportation energy source would be a very good thing, but it won’t have much to do with reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, at least not in the short term.
Sharpen your pencil and think clear thoughts, and the world will delight in the wisdom of your writing. Regrettably, this article produces more heat than delight.