<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D.C. ponders paid sick-leave mandate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/</link>
	<description>FSB Features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Harrell-Mozie,RN</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-9905</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Harrell-Mozie,RN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-9905</guid>
		<description>I have a question.I am a part-time employee,but I do not have a second job. I am also an RN. I am working part-time because I am not able to work full-time a the present ,time because my husband is recovering from surgery. Am I exempt?I have been on the job for 120 days.
 I thank you in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question.I am a part-time employee,but I do not have a second job. I am also an RN. I am working part-time because I am not able to work full-time a the present ,time because my husband is recovering from surgery. Am I exempt?I have been on the job for 120 days.<br />
 I thank you in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek, Cincinnati</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-7854</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek, Cincinnati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-7854</guid>
		<description>I do not get all the people worked up when their employer makes them use their &quot;paid Time off&quot; when they are sick.  It is a sick day with another name.  If you do not need it because you are generally healthy, you can take it as vacation.  There is no punishment here, it is a paid day off, use it as you need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not get all the people worked up when their employer makes them use their &#034;paid Time off&#034; when they are sick.  It is a sick day with another name.  If you do not need it because you are generally healthy, you can take it as vacation.  There is no punishment here, it is a paid day off, use it as you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5854</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5854</guid>
		<description>A few people have commented here how difficult it is to start a new business and it certainly is.  It can take a few years before a business becomes profitable.  However, 3 paid sick days per year is *not* much of an expense to build into a start up plan.  We&#039;re talking a few hundred dollars here per employee.  A responsible start up with good management and proper funding(your credit card is *not* proper funding by the way) should be able to swing this.  

If a few hundred dollars topples your whole business plan--like some of you are claiming--then you truly are lousy at business management.  You should close up shop and stop wasting space in the mall or wherever you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few people have commented here how difficult it is to start a new business and it certainly is.  It can take a few years before a business becomes profitable.  However, 3 paid sick days per year is *not* much of an expense to build into a start up plan.  We&#039;re talking a few hundred dollars here per employee.  A responsible start up with good management and proper funding(your credit card is *not* proper funding by the way) should be able to swing this.  </p>
<p>If a few hundred dollars topples your whole business plan&#8211;like some of you are claiming&#8211;then you truly are lousy at business management.  You should close up shop and stop wasting space in the mall or wherever you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh dallas tx</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5851</link>
		<dc:creator>josh dallas tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5851</guid>
		<description>oh no employers have to give sick days now he world is going to come to an end omg now the ceo&#039;s of these big companies will only get 24mill a year how will they survive give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh no employers have to give sick days now he world is going to come to an end omg now the ceo&#039;s of these big companies will only get 24mill a year how will they survive give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Atlanta GA</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Atlanta GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5849</guid>
		<description>Hopefully !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken, Charlotte, NC</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken, Charlotte, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5847</guid>
		<description>We are turning into a socialist state!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are turning into a socialist state!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5846</guid>
		<description>Actually, the thing that is bad about this and any rules and regulations that the government institutes is that they are unconstitutional.  Do you realize how many regulations the government has placed on businesses that cost money?  Additionally one person spoke about how that business is too shaky and about to fail if they can&#039;t afford to give paid sick leave?  Have you ever started a business yourself.   It takes up to 3 years to build a business until it&#039;s really profitable.  Government helps to create some of the bankruptcies that occur just because of all the rules, regulations and taxes that take away any possible profit.  If people don&#039;t want to work for a company that doesn&#039;t offer paid sick leave, then they don&#039;t need to take the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the thing that is bad about this and any rules and regulations that the government institutes is that they are unconstitutional.  Do you realize how many regulations the government has placed on businesses that cost money?  Additionally one person spoke about how that business is too shaky and about to fail if they can&#039;t afford to give paid sick leave?  Have you ever started a business yourself.   It takes up to 3 years to build a business until it&#039;s really profitable.  Government helps to create some of the bankruptcies that occur just because of all the rules, regulations and taxes that take away any possible profit.  If people don&#039;t want to work for a company that doesn&#039;t offer paid sick leave, then they don&#039;t need to take the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda, Savannah, GA</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5843</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda, Savannah, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5843</guid>
		<description>My husband works for a large supermarket chain, and has NO paid sick leave.  Employees may earn 1 personal day a year after 1 year.  He was home with a fever of 102, severe respiratory infection, and was called to find out how soon he could return to work.  His presence working with food products would endanger customers as well as co-workers.  It is a real financial hardship if he is sick.  He was not even allowed one night off to attend my mother&#039;s funeral!  He has only 1 week of paid vacation per year, works every weekend, so we have very limited time together, as I work also.  He is paid for maybe 3 or 4 holidays a year. By contrast, I work 20 hours a week for a non-profit, have 40 hours sick leave per year, which rolls over, and 96 hours of paid vacation.  In addition, I have 12 paid holidays.  All of which I consider to be very generous.  The rollover time came in very handy when I was injured in an auto accident, which was not my fault, and was paid over $1100 in sick leave.  If this happened to him, we could be in danger of being unable to pay the mortgage and car payments. For comparison, I make over $14 per hour, he makes just over $10 per hour.

Paid sick leave makes sense - some do abuse it, just like they sometimes abuse emergency rooms for non-emergencies.  I feel it&#039;s safer to have a sick person stay home rather than spread illness.  If it helps keep people honest, require a doctor&#039;s note for absences of more than 3 days.

I agree that hiring and training a new employee is far more costly than losing good employees because they can&#039;t afford to work for you. And if sick leave is abused, then that employee may not be worth keeping, and can be grounds for termination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband works for a large supermarket chain, and has NO paid sick leave.  Employees may earn 1 personal day a year after 1 year.  He was home with a fever of 102, severe respiratory infection, and was called to find out how soon he could return to work.  His presence working with food products would endanger customers as well as co-workers.  It is a real financial hardship if he is sick.  He was not even allowed one night off to attend my mother&#039;s funeral!  He has only 1 week of paid vacation per year, works every weekend, so we have very limited time together, as I work also.  He is paid for maybe 3 or 4 holidays a year. By contrast, I work 20 hours a week for a non-profit, have 40 hours sick leave per year, which rolls over, and 96 hours of paid vacation.  In addition, I have 12 paid holidays.  All of which I consider to be very generous.  The rollover time came in very handy when I was injured in an auto accident, which was not my fault, and was paid over $1100 in sick leave.  If this happened to him, we could be in danger of being unable to pay the mortgage and car payments. For comparison, I make over $14 per hour, he makes just over $10 per hour.</p>
<p>Paid sick leave makes sense &#8211; some do abuse it, just like they sometimes abuse emergency rooms for non-emergencies.  I feel it&#039;s safer to have a sick person stay home rather than spread illness.  If it helps keep people honest, require a doctor&#039;s note for absences of more than 3 days.</p>
<p>I agree that hiring and training a new employee is far more costly than losing good employees because they can&#039;t afford to work for you. And if sick leave is abused, then that employee may not be worth keeping, and can be grounds for termination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan, Illinois</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan, Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>Most every business owner has been an employee at one time or another.  I wish most employees could buy into and run a business for six months.  I believe some, if not most would be singing a different tune about this and other government mandates. 

When the minimum wage was increased in Illinois to 7.50 per hour, we did what we had to stay competitive with our out of state competitors:  We had to let our three employees go.  My wife and I now do all of the work.  That is government not having a clue about economics and how small business works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most every business owner has been an employee at one time or another.  I wish most employees could buy into and run a business for six months.  I believe some, if not most would be singing a different tune about this and other government mandates. </p>
<p>When the minimum wage was increased in Illinois to 7.50 per hour, we did what we had to stay competitive with our out of state competitors:  We had to let our three employees go.  My wife and I now do all of the work.  That is government not having a clue about economics and how small business works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin, Centralia, Washington</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin, Centralia, Washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>I work at a company that requires workers to put in what are usually 60-70 hour weeks with one day off. They offer three sick days, starting after one year. I remember not long ago there were headlines about Japan working people to death with respect to far less hours. As someone mentioned above, we have clearly very sick people coming to work anyway because they can&#039;t do otherwise. Personally I called in sick one day with a temperature of 102 and was told to come in anyway which I did. Interestingly, when I interviewed for the position, the interviewer said one of their problems were employees who called in sick but then called in sick the next day too. What I don&#039;t understand is why it isn&#039;t a problem for people with the flu to come in and infect everyone, lowering productivity and quality enormously, leading to the need for everyone to work 60-70 hours. False economy, just plain stupid, and blatantly dangerous in my opinion. I don&#039;t know how but someone should seriously estimate how many deaths per year could be caused by schedules such as these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at a company that requires workers to put in what are usually 60-70 hour weeks with one day off. They offer three sick days, starting after one year. I remember not long ago there were headlines about Japan working people to death with respect to far less hours. As someone mentioned above, we have clearly very sick people coming to work anyway because they can&#039;t do otherwise. Personally I called in sick one day with a temperature of 102 and was told to come in anyway which I did. Interestingly, when I interviewed for the position, the interviewer said one of their problems were employees who called in sick but then called in sick the next day too. What I don&#039;t understand is why it isn&#039;t a problem for people with the flu to come in and infect everyone, lowering productivity and quality enormously, leading to the need for everyone to work 60-70 hours. False economy, just plain stupid, and blatantly dangerous in my opinion. I don&#039;t know how but someone should seriously estimate how many deaths per year could be caused by schedules such as these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston,  Boise, Idaho</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5838</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston,  Boise, Idaho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5838</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s all be honest here...America has had it&#039;s day. History teaches hard lessons concerning great powers. They have all failed due to financial problems not military defeats. It&#039;s frightening to see how similiar our footsteps are following all other great world powers as they slid into obscurity.

The government is not attempting to collect more dollars from all of us to head of this unavoidable financial crisis. All governments from local to federal have one theme in mind...collect as much tax as possible from each citizen. When you are on sick leave you are not paying taxes! We do not have a national health care plan due to the simple fact that all the people working just for health benefits will then quit! They no longer would be on the tax paying rolls for government. College graduates could take time off before their careers begin under a national healyh plan to enjoy life. However, they would not be paying taxes to the government!!!!

Bottom line....your only function is to make money and give a huge portion to the government. They have no use for you(with the exception of being a soldier) if you are NOT paying taxes. DO NOT TAKE ANY DAYS OFF FROM WORK! It costs all the really smart people we sent to D.C. money. HAHA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s all be honest here&#8230;America has had it&#039;s day. History teaches hard lessons concerning great powers. They have all failed due to financial problems not military defeats. It&#039;s frightening to see how similiar our footsteps are following all other great world powers as they slid into obscurity.</p>
<p>The government is not attempting to collect more dollars from all of us to head of this unavoidable financial crisis. All governments from local to federal have one theme in mind&#8230;collect as much tax as possible from each citizen. When you are on sick leave you are not paying taxes! We do not have a national health care plan due to the simple fact that all the people working just for health benefits will then quit! They no longer would be on the tax paying rolls for government. College graduates could take time off before their careers begin under a national healyh plan to enjoy life. However, they would not be paying taxes to the government!!!!</p>
<p>Bottom line&#8230;.your only function is to make money and give a huge portion to the government. They have no use for you(with the exception of being a soldier) if you are NOT paying taxes. DO NOT TAKE ANY DAYS OFF FROM WORK! It costs all the really smart people we sent to D.C. money. HAHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Omaha NE</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Omaha NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about the small businesses that feel these are unfair requirements.  

First, the sick leave doesn&#039;t kick in until after a person has been employed a year.  A year is a nice period of time for you to determine if your employee is reliable enough to keep around.  Second, part time employees accrue time more slowly than full time, so a person working 20 hours a week will earn a whopping 1.5 sick days per year.

People already get sick and miss work.  The only difference is that, under the new law, your loyal and reliable employees (full time, worked with you over a year) will be paid for 3 of those sick days per year.  Lets say you have a municiple mandated minimum wage of $10/hr for 8 hours a day.  That means that a worked will receive a maximum of 24 hours of paid leave, costing you $240 plus taxes (which are partially offset by the tax deduction you get for paying income).  If $240 per year is too much to pay for a loyal and reliable employee, I dare say that you may want to rethink your management strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m curious about the small businesses that feel these are unfair requirements.  </p>
<p>First, the sick leave doesn&#039;t kick in until after a person has been employed a year.  A year is a nice period of time for you to determine if your employee is reliable enough to keep around.  Second, part time employees accrue time more slowly than full time, so a person working 20 hours a week will earn a whopping 1.5 sick days per year.</p>
<p>People already get sick and miss work.  The only difference is that, under the new law, your loyal and reliable employees (full time, worked with you over a year) will be paid for 3 of those sick days per year.  Lets say you have a municiple mandated minimum wage of $10/hr for 8 hours a day.  That means that a worked will receive a maximum of 24 hours of paid leave, costing you $240 plus taxes (which are partially offset by the tax deduction you get for paying income).  If $240 per year is too much to pay for a loyal and reliable employee, I dare say that you may want to rethink your management strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex, New York, NY</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex, New York, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>If your business is so shaky you can&#039;t afford to allow a sick employee to stay home then your business is probably failing anyway.  This law is not actually asking a lot.  3-7 days is nothing compared to what a lot of employers provide.  You are afraid of employees taking advantage of you?  Well, that is MUCH more likely to happen if they feel you are giving them sub-par benefits.  If you think paying for a sick day is expensive, the expense of finding another employee is even more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your business is so shaky you can&#039;t afford to allow a sick employee to stay home then your business is probably failing anyway.  This law is not actually asking a lot.  3-7 days is nothing compared to what a lot of employers provide.  You are afraid of employees taking advantage of you?  Well, that is MUCH more likely to happen if they feel you are giving them sub-par benefits.  If you think paying for a sick day is expensive, the expense of finding another employee is even more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>Companies are so abusive with PTO.  I remember when every fulltime job had vacation and sick days.  Now they lump it together and call it PTO.  Even then, they don&#039;t even tell how they put restrictions on it when they hire you.  They can&#039;t because it is at &quot;manager&#039;s discretion&quot;.  Even profitable companies play this game and then wonder why their employees aren&#039;t happy and they have turnover rates so high.

Look at the lists of best places to work.  The ones most highly rated by their their employees are the ones that have perks like better time off policies.  They aren&#039;t even the highest paying employers, but their perks like that make up the difference.

I would also add for those employers who think your employees are out to screw you by taking a sick day: If your business is that marginal, maybe you shouldn&#039;t be in business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies are so abusive with PTO.  I remember when every fulltime job had vacation and sick days.  Now they lump it together and call it PTO.  Even then, they don&#039;t even tell how they put restrictions on it when they hire you.  They can&#039;t because it is at &#034;manager&#039;s discretion&#034;.  Even profitable companies play this game and then wonder why their employees aren&#039;t happy and they have turnover rates so high.</p>
<p>Look at the lists of best places to work.  The ones most highly rated by their their employees are the ones that have perks like better time off policies.  They aren&#039;t even the highest paying employers, but their perks like that make up the difference.</p>
<p>I would also add for those employers who think your employees are out to screw you by taking a sick day: If your business is that marginal, maybe you shouldn&#039;t be in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua, washington dc</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua, washington dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>This is a great step forward for workers. I don&#039;t see this as a huge burden on companies. For those concerned about abuse of this policy companies can surely require a doctor&#039;s  note at some point if they choose. 

In regards to Susan&#039;s comments about being a Small Business Owner you are correct that your work is required for the company to make money. BUT that is one of the risks you took when you started your company. You knew that going into this. I applaud your courage to start an enterprise but that is part of the benefits of working for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great step forward for workers. I don&#039;t see this as a huge burden on companies. For those concerned about abuse of this policy companies can surely require a doctor&#039;s  note at some point if they choose. </p>
<p>In regards to Susan&#039;s comments about being a Small Business Owner you are correct that your work is required for the company to make money. BUT that is one of the risks you took when you started your company. You knew that going into this. I applaud your courage to start an enterprise but that is part of the benefits of working for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James, Washington DC</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>James, Washington DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure most of you haven&#039;t actually read the DC legislation like I have, so let me inform you of a couple of things:
1) it would mandate 3,5, and 7 days based upon the size of employer, as determined by the number of employees.
 2) the accrual rate is sooo slow that the only way for anyone to get all 3,5, or 7 days a year would be to work full-time EVERY week of the year, meaning a person in the &quot;3 day category&quot; who starts accruing leave on Jan. 1 wouldn&#039;t accrue that third day until Dce. 31.
3) for business that already offer sick leave that at or more than the days the bill calls for, the bill doesn&#039;t apply to them.
Seems to me, that it would be really hard to abuse a leave policy that takes, in the case of a small business (3 day category), about 4 months just to earn 1 day of leave.  In short, this is a lot of noise over nothing.  Of course this is an extra expense, but this bill (which I know the details of) is very reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure most of you haven&#039;t actually read the DC legislation like I have, so let me inform you of a couple of things:<br />
1) it would mandate 3,5, and 7 days based upon the size of employer, as determined by the number of employees.<br />
 2) the accrual rate is sooo slow that the only way for anyone to get all 3,5, or 7 days a year would be to work full-time EVERY week of the year, meaning a person in the &#034;3 day category&#034; who starts accruing leave on Jan. 1 wouldn&#039;t accrue that third day until Dce. 31.<br />
3) for business that already offer sick leave that at or more than the days the bill calls for, the bill doesn&#039;t apply to them.<br />
Seems to me, that it would be really hard to abuse a leave policy that takes, in the case of a small business (3 day category), about 4 months just to earn 1 day of leave.  In short, this is a lot of noise over nothing.  Of course this is an extra expense, but this bill (which I know the details of) is very reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.H., Boca Raton, FL</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>G.H., Boca Raton, FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s John Galt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#039;s John Galt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Downs, MD Columbia, SC</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Downs, MD Columbia, SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>I am a new small business owner with 4 (3 part time and 1 full time) employees and think this is an extremely unfair blanket requirement.  I offer paid time off after a trial period of 90 days as a reward for advancement, but have had great difficulty with employees missing work and taking advantage of a loose definition of sick leave.  When an employee does not show up or do any work to earn income for the business, I should not be required to pay out of my pocket (with borrowed money as is the case for most new small businesses) to pay that employee and a replacement employee plus all the usual employment taxes on both wages.  If this is a goverment requirement there should be a reimbursement or tax deduction to cover extra mandated expenses.
As an employee you already have many advantages that unfortunately most do not appreciate.  As the owner of a small business I have no paid leave ( sick or vacation) if I am not there the business does not earn income and I don&#039;t get paid.  I have to use my savings to cover any time I leave and often hire some form of coverage.  I have no garanteed job security if the business doesn&#039;t succeed I am out of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a new small business owner with 4 (3 part time and 1 full time) employees and think this is an extremely unfair blanket requirement.  I offer paid time off after a trial period of 90 days as a reward for advancement, but have had great difficulty with employees missing work and taking advantage of a loose definition of sick leave.  When an employee does not show up or do any work to earn income for the business, I should not be required to pay out of my pocket (with borrowed money as is the case for most new small businesses) to pay that employee and a replacement employee plus all the usual employment taxes on both wages.  If this is a goverment requirement there should be a reimbursement or tax deduction to cover extra mandated expenses.<br />
As an employee you already have many advantages that unfortunately most do not appreciate.  As the owner of a small business I have no paid leave ( sick or vacation) if I am not there the business does not earn income and I don&#039;t get paid.  I have to use my savings to cover any time I leave and often hire some form of coverage.  I have no garanteed job security if the business doesn&#039;t succeed I am out of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Poisson, Draper, UT</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Poisson, Draper, UT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2760</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately U.S. Capitalist Idealism has run amok.  Granted, businesses are in business to make money/profit. 

There was a time when employers were &#039;loyal&#039; to employees by providing excellent health-care, pensions, vacation-time, and sick-days.  There was a healthy balance between the amount of profit made at the cost of their employees.  Employees in return, were steadfastly loyal to their employers.

Today, we have companies, even small ones, where the top dogs earn millions a year, get millions more when they get fired after screwing the company into the ground, and these same employers skimp and cut every possible corner/&#039;benefit&#039; to the disadvantage of their employees.  If you want health-care, you&#039;d better be ready to pay a hefty portion of the cost, plus co-pays.  Time off is now PTO, and total number of days allowed has been reduced in the process.  Pension?  What&#039;s a pension?  The new-deal is, if you want to be able to retire and survive, you&#039;re on your own to save and invest for yourself.

I&#039;m a 20-year retired Air Force Veteran.  I have family in Quebec, Canada, and lived three years in Europe.  Member nations of the EC all provide six (6) full weeks of paid vacation as well as at least five or more sick-days per year, by LAW.  These countries also have very effective socialized medicine.  Pensions are provided at the &#039;federal&#039; level and provide for a very good retirement, as well as security.  These countries are all very financially viable.

If the U.S. wants to seen  as a true leader/success in the eyes of the world, we HAVE to enact Federal legislation to force employers to take care of their employees and get away from just looking at profit-margins.  It&#039;s apparent that U.S. employers effectively don&#039;t give a crap about their employees anymore, including Congress for the veterans.  Personally,  my pension from the Air Force was CUT by nearly $450/monthly, retroactively years after I had enlisted.

Even though I&#039;m a retired vet, I don&#039;t have that much pride in my country anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately U.S. Capitalist Idealism has run amok.  Granted, businesses are in business to make money/profit. </p>
<p>There was a time when employers were &#039;loyal&#039; to employees by providing excellent health-care, pensions, vacation-time, and sick-days.  There was a healthy balance between the amount of profit made at the cost of their employees.  Employees in return, were steadfastly loyal to their employers.</p>
<p>Today, we have companies, even small ones, where the top dogs earn millions a year, get millions more when they get fired after screwing the company into the ground, and these same employers skimp and cut every possible corner/&#039;benefit&#039; to the disadvantage of their employees.  If you want health-care, you&#039;d better be ready to pay a hefty portion of the cost, plus co-pays.  Time off is now PTO, and total number of days allowed has been reduced in the process.  Pension?  What&#039;s a pension?  The new-deal is, if you want to be able to retire and survive, you&#039;re on your own to save and invest for yourself.</p>
<p>I&#039;m a 20-year retired Air Force Veteran.  I have family in Quebec, Canada, and lived three years in Europe.  Member nations of the EC all provide six (6) full weeks of paid vacation as well as at least five or more sick-days per year, by LAW.  These countries also have very effective socialized medicine.  Pensions are provided at the &#039;federal&#039; level and provide for a very good retirement, as well as security.  These countries are all very financially viable.</p>
<p>If the U.S. wants to seen  as a true leader/success in the eyes of the world, we HAVE to enact Federal legislation to force employers to take care of their employees and get away from just looking at profit-margins.  It&#039;s apparent that U.S. employers effectively don&#039;t give a crap about their employees anymore, including Congress for the veterans.  Personally,  my pension from the Air Force was CUT by nearly $450/monthly, retroactively years after I had enlisted.</p>
<p>Even though I&#039;m a retired vet, I don&#039;t have that much pride in my country anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam, West Australia</title>
		<link>http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam, West Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fsbfeatures.blogs.fsb.cnn.com/2008/01/16/dc-ponders-paid-sick-leave-mandate/#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>I laugh at people who use the &quot;that&#039;s what makes this country so great, as opposed to the socialists&quot; line. I have free medical and some of the best and brightest doctors on the face of the earth live here in our socialist Australia. I earn 50k a year here in a job reserved for citizens, doing the same job I did in the US for $12 an hour (before they outsourced to India). I have 4 weeks annual leave and 2 weeks sick leave which roll over if I don&#039;t use them. Sure there are abusers who take more days off than, but those fools are located in all socities &quot;socialist&quot; or otherwise. Minimum wage here is $13.45 fought for by Unions. I would take working conditions in Australia any day of the week...oh look, I did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laugh at people who use the &#034;that&#039;s what makes this country so great, as opposed to the socialists&#034; line. I have free medical and some of the best and brightest doctors on the face of the earth live here in our socialist Australia. I earn 50k a year here in a job reserved for citizens, doing the same job I did in the US for $12 an hour (before they outsourced to India). I have 4 weeks annual leave and 2 weeks sick leave which roll over if I don&#039;t use them. Sure there are abusers who take more days off than, but those fools are located in all socities &#034;socialist&#034; or otherwise. Minimum wage here is $13.45 fought for by Unions. I would take working conditions in Australia any day of the week&#8230;oh look, I did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
